If you place “animal rights” into a blog search engine, you
will find as just as much ridicule for the cause as activism.
Why this recent disdain?
- Of course the extreme tactics of some animal rights’ activists don’t help.
- Or maybe it's the fear of disrupting our economy (a lot of which is fueled by industries that hurt animals).
- It could be that people just don’t connect emotionally to animals
Leave it to me to plumb the unconscious, but I think
something more insidious is going on.
For the sake of argument, let’s just say it all started
after (the) September 11th.
Americans felt strangely weak and vulnerable, and naturally
looked for ways to assert their power and rights. The easiest targets – animals.
This may sound like a stretch, but think of it this way:
When the authority of a person in power is undermined, he will rule in a
particularly harsh manner. For example, the older brother, just punished by his
parents, in turn torments his little sister.
But how were we to reaffirm our power after 9/11 exposed our
vulnerability?
Well, the American
system has overcome racism and sexism (for the most part), so that’s out of the
question. And now even children have rights. These days, the only borderline
subjects are animals. They easily fall victim to national moods, becoming the
objects of exploitation and violence when we do not feel secure in our positions.
This collective renewal of animal exploitation is not
conscious… but neither is the motivation for buying fur, exclaiming pride at
eating veal, and making fun of people who think other creatures are important
too. Since our instincts and laws do not force us to protect animals, we can
assert our might over the natural world by churning its creatures through our
ruthless industrial machine.
This may explain why some people argue for a “right” to wear
fur. What does this stylistic choice reveal? Well, fur costs a lot of money,
and money is power. But the decision to wear fur expresses something further.
The garment says (of the wearer): “I have the power to put a being to death so
that I may enjoy one of its byproducts.” This is the declaration of absolute
power – killing for luxury, not necessity, and not having to answer for this
act. For evidence, just research the most brutal of dictatorial regimes.
When someone claims that he has the right to use animals
according to his whim, he reveals the following unconscious beliefs:
- That he is still, without realizing it, a vestige of the “Copernican” model of the universe. That is, that the sun revolves around the earth -- that humans are the center of the universe – and thus, the universe (and its inhabitants) exists in order to be used by us.
- That he feels insecure, vulnerable, or weak – and therefore asserts power wherever he can.
How can we protect animals from human whims produced by
societal and economic flux? How can we take this issue beyond what is “trendy,”
convenient, or fits the current mood?
Legislative changes are needed to protect the vulnerable from the whims of the powerful…historically
exploited races, children, the disabled, the mentally ill all have rights…why not add animals
to that list?
Technorati Tags:
animal-rights
animal rights
fur
fashion
society